« The new PR: No more 'press releases' - 'PUBLIC' releases!' | Main | Thirty days hath September... »

Don't make [YOUR NAME HERE]'s mistake!

Sunday, October 10, 2004 at 08:39PM

I’m not the biggest fan of cookie dough. I’d prefer to eat a gooey chewy baked cookie (chocolate chip, of course!) And when it comes to pre-digested press releases, here’s a warning: DIGEST THEM BEFORE YOU SEND THEM.

Got one a couple days ago from a state agency here in Oregon, that obviously got it from another source, because peppered through it, where there’s supposed to be a city or state’s name, it was (CITY, STATE) and (DESCRIBE EVENT) and (TIME) and (LOCATION), etc.

At first I had to laugh, then I thought, “Oww. Poor Press-Release Sender.” As they say in some of the … thinner comedies out there, right after a particuarly painful event: “That’s gotta hurt.”

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    566571000ff2
  • Response
    Response: boston museums
    boston museums
  • Response
    Response: winter sports
    winter sports

Reader Comments (8)

The tradegy of press release astroturfing.

No, the REAL tragedy is that the parts that they left out in that press release, that is all us editors *WANT*, we don't need the rest of the BS that the template they were using provides. That is not true about all press releases, but about EVENTS in particular.

People who send event releases like to build themselves up, but almost always forget to provide vital information about the event.. perhaps where it's held, but often the bare specifics about where it's held, like address or contact info for people who want to attend. Instead they provide their own contact info and they are never available just before the event when actual participants will call with questions. We aim to publish such vital details you know :P
October 11, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterJesse Thompson
Agreed with Jesse. Event press releases should include all of the event's information in a list at the top of the release, and then the PR/promotional crap below it. Makes it far easier to digest that way.
October 11, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterJake
Agreed, guys. Best is a hybrid - calendar info atop, then a few paragraphs of summary below. Then folks don't need to do TWO releases/advisories, which just boosts the odds of leaving something crucial out of one and/or both;-)
October 11, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterBarney
I saw a few press releases on bend.com with events i was interested in attending but all three came from the same organization and didn't have the place of the event on it. How sad.

I hope the ones I send are ok.
October 11, 2004 | Unregistered Commentershannon
Hey, Simone, when ya see one like that, PLEASE LET ME/US KNOW. We can insert the missing info. (I had one the other day from Sierra Club, but I didn't notice the missing locale - they did, and followed up, so I inserted it.)
October 11, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterBarney
when did my name come Simone?

it was on all the Girl Scouts stuff
October 12, 2004 | Unregistered Commentershannon
Whoops. Sorry. Another lady I know. I seem to recall the Girl Scouts stuff being OK, but hmm, looking at the "Girl Scouts Forever" one right now, as posted by a colleague, either you left out the "where" or it got cut out.
October 12, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterBarney
Yep, swim party also is missing location (though seems pretty obvious it'd have to be Juniper.)
October 12, 2004 | Unregistered CommenterBarney

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.