Entries by Barney Lerten (2)

Understandable, but still frustrating...

Monday, January 10, 2005 at 10:36AM

I totally understand why police officers frequently have to save doing a press release for the end of their shift, quite frequently in the middle of the night, etc. They have real, police-type work to do. But as someone on the receiving end of those releases, I have a small request: Have someone else, fresher than yourself, read them over before you send them out - and maybe, have THEM rewrite it for clarity, if need be. I’d rather get it late, and clean, then fast and … problematic.

The media will never be the top priority for a line officer or somesuch, but … when basic facts are missing or so convoluted as to defy straightening, it doesn’t do anyone any good. So I urge all supervisors at police departments to at least work on a check list for the deputies, etc. so they can be sure to fill the bill (names, ages, vehicle description, etc.) - and to hold training sessions. Heck, I’d volunteer to help with them, because it would help me as much as it would help them!

Police releases - the 5 Ws and H

Sunday, September 26, 2004 at 01:03PM

Everyone knows the Five Ws (Who, What, When, Where, Why) and H (how), right?

But I'm not going to sit here and say I expect a trained law enforcement official to be thinking all that clearly about that at 4 a.m., when a press release is the last thing between them and a soft, warm bedCan't write anything.

So here are some examples, from a Bend PD release done at that ... wee hour of the morning. It talked of a restaurant robbery, and included the victim's name - something Bend police do, but newspapers do NOT include, usually, unless the person was injured and we need to tell their condition, etc.

This release told that a gunman had entered the restaurant, confronted the employee "and demanded she give him money. The suspect then left the business through a back door..."

Two things missing there - ones we can ASSume as reporters, but dare not: Did the worker GIVE him any money? (I know they usually say "undisclosed amount of cash" - that's fine, but at least make that clear!) And ... was she hurt? No, of course not, the release would have said. Still ... a good reporter will feel far more comfortable (and not need to reach for the phone) ... if it makes CLEAR that the worker was/was not injured.

It might have taken the lieutenant five minutes more to add that. But ... the recipient would feel that much more comfortable about not ASSuming anything.